![]() Backup these files to a external hard disk.Copy pictures from the mobile devices (tablets, phones.In my old strategy I only did the first and the last point. and on a device in a physically different location (for example a service in the cloud).on a seperate device (for example an external hard-disk).Given a device that stores valuable data. So all other users were forced to look elsewhere for a backup solution.Ī good time to revise the backup strategy. But CrashPlan decided to focus on business customers only. I used to use CrashPlan to back up my files to an external service. But also some other things I want to get back if my hard-drive crashes or gets erased by ransomware. The most important ones are - of course - pictures of loved ones. Acronis got users complain about their download speed and I found no detail about their encryption method.I have some files on my computer that I do not want to loose. And backblaze requires sending your encryption key to their server for restoring, which makes no sense to me. As for the rest, I didn't have a good time with duplicati two years ago. If I give up arq completely in the future, I'll use Duplicacy as a replacement.Ībove are what I spent time on for the last few days. But overall it works smoothly which is most important. The web-ui is a little bit glitchy, and I personally feel the settings are somehow weird. I think its idea utilising file path as a substitute to database makes the software relatively simple thus more reliable. Like tarsnap, the sorce code is available but the license is not free.ĭuplicacy starts form 2016 (according to github), records are not long but good. It supports all major platform, can send backups to S3/GDrive/ODrive/Dropbox. I basically just pay for tarsnap to say thanks to the author :) And the price is expensive (0.25$ /GB/Mon for storage, 0.25$ /GB for traffic). Tarsnap can only backup to storage provided by author (essentially S3 from amazon). ![]() I learned a lot about general backup tech by just reading the manual of tarsnap. The author really knows every detail about this backup thing and explains very well in the document. The author, the software, the documents and its business model all together is a big HARDCORE. The source code is openly available, but the license is not open-source. This comes from FreeBSD security officer Dr. Borgbase is new and designed for borg, it's easier to use with borg than rsync. rsync seems professional and doing very well to provide simple reliable storage, also have a long good track. There are some ready to use providers besides building yourself a VPS. One downside for Borg is that it requires server-side support, so you can't put your backups to S3, Dropbox or Onedrive. ![]() (This kind of check is weaker than a completely integrity verification, for the detail please read ) People are satisfied with its reliability.Īnother thing I like about Borg is, it can check CRC32 of the segment on server side and even try to repair it! This means you don't need to download everything to client, therefore very fast. And according to what I got on Google, its 10-years-long track seems pretty good. The software is open-source and well-documented. The core is written in C/Cython thus highly efficient. ![]() It works on Mac and Linux/Unix, with carefully designed encryption and deduplication. Having study this for days, and omg backup is no easy job even you're willing to pay for it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |